Pin itPalmer's Grand Strand staple, rebuilt for a new generation.
Designed by Arnold Palmer (1973, renovated 2025)
$80–$140
Booking via GolfNow
King's North at Myrtle Beach National is Arnold Palmer's 1973 design, renovated in 2025 by Palmer Design associate Brandon Johnson. Few Grand Strand courses carry as much accumulated round-count history; for years it was a default choice for package golfers drawn by the Palmer name and a routing that rewarded aggression without severely punishing caution. By 2024, decades of traffic had taken their toll. The renovation is a thorough modernisation rather than a philosophical overhaul.
The work touched every green complex, rebuilt bunkers to contemporary drainage standards, and regrassed throughout. Johnson kept the routing's essential character, including the risk-reward par fives and the signature island green on the par-three sixth, while firming up edges that years of softening had blurred. Greens now show more defined contour, with collection areas in place of the vague run-off zones that had developed over time. The result plays with more precision than it has in years while keeping the welcoming width off the tee that made it popular.
The sixth is still the marquee moment, an island green surrounded by water in the theatrical Palmer tradition. It plays shorter than it looks, typically 150 to 170 yards depending on tee and pin, and the green is large enough to absorb a slightly off-centre iron. Drama is real, execution is fair, which fits King's North's overall philosophy.
First-year-post-renovation conditioning has been notably strong. New turf established cleanly and the course reopened with wall-to-wall grass coverage older regulars may not recognise. Bunkers drain properly for the first time in years. Green speeds run consistent rather than variable, a chronic issue on heavily trafficked Myrtle Beach corridor courses.
Pace has historically been a concern here, more about volume than design. The renovation included improved cart-path routing and better flow between greens and tees, which should help. Expect four-and-a-half-hour rounds during busy periods and closer to four hours on quieter weekday afternoons.
At $80 to $140 depending on season and time of day, King's North sits at the upper edge of the mid-range tier, and the post-renovation product justifies the pricing. For a Myrtle Beach trip on a moderate budget, this is a sensible anchor round: a recognisable name, a design with character, and conditioning that now matches the reputation. The Palmer connection isn't merely cosmetic; the routing reflects his preference for generous fairways paired with demanding approaches, a combination that keeps rounds moving while still separating scores.
Tee times are available through the booking link on this page. Myrtle Beach National operates as a multi-course facility, and King's North is the flagship. Availability is generally good outside peak spring and fall windows, though weekend mornings in March, April, and October fill quickly. For a wider Grand Strand itinerary, build out with TPC Myrtle Beach, Tidewater Golf Club, Caledonia Golf and Fish Club, True Blue Golf Club, the Dunes Golf and Beach Club, the Barefoot Resort courses (Norman, Dye, Love, or Fazio), or one of the Legends Resort layouts (Heathland or Moorland).
Accommodations near King's North at Myrtle Beach National

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Barefoot Resort & Golf (Villas)


Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Rees Jones's mature tree-lined layout, quietly aging into its best version.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Pete Dye's contribution to Barefoot Resort: the longest, hardest, and most polarizing of the four courses.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
The most visually refined of Barefoot's four courses, built by Fazio through pines, lakes, and waste bunkers.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Davis Love III's most playable design at Barefoot, routed through Lowcountry wetlands and live oaks.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Australian links influences transplanted to the Carolina Lowcountry, with greens built for ground-game creativity.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
The most welcoming course on the Grand Strand, with the slope rating to match.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
The Grand Strand's quietest argument for greatness, served with a bowl of fish chowder.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
A former Nicklaus associate's best value play in the Calabash corridor.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
The original. Robert Trent Jones Sr's 1949 design that put Myrtle Beach golf on the map.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
The longest course on the Grand Strand, with five holes along the Intracoastal Waterway.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Tom Doak's links experiment on the Carolina coast, wind included.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
The Dye family's trademark visual intimidation, priced for resort play.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Arthur Hills redesign in the middle of everything, priced for daily play.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Nicklaus Signature design where Lowcountry marsh meets strategic golf.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
The Granddaddy of the Grand Strand, playing golf since 1927.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
SC's 2025 Course of the Year, open to the public and flying under the radar.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Palmer's riverside signature in Brunswick County, with the slope rating to prove it.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Twenty-seven holes of Scottish-flavored design in Sunset Beach.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Oceanfront holes and marsh crossings on the Cherry Grove peninsula, at a fraction of the expected price.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
The only TPC-branded public course on the Grand Strand, built by Fazio through Lowcountry wetlands.

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Mike Strantz's bolder sibling to Caledonia, routed through the ruins of an indigo plantation.
Full guide: courses, stays, getting there.
Continue →Pre-planned trips to Myrtle Beach.
Continue →10 non-golf activities at Myrtle Beach.
Continue →Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you book through these links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This does not influence our editorial recommendations.